Chances are, if you’re reading this, you’re already attuned to the concept of Net Neutrality and why it’s a good thing. If you’re not dialed into it and why it’s essential for the future, or if you want to see it explained in the most BS-free way possible, check out this four minute clip. It’s all clear for the moment, but we might have to stand up and fight for it sooner than later.
2 Responses to Net Neutrality – Get Onboard
Leave a Reply Click here to cancel reply.
Follow @chasejarvis on Twitter
-
Nikon D4 Camera Is Here.
165 Comments -
10 Things Every Creative Person (That’s YOU) Must Learn
139 Comments -
The Hit List: 13 Things Crucial For Your Success [In Any Field]
95 Comments -
Think You Don’t Need to Focus? Think Again.
81 Comments -
No, But I Can Learn
74 Comments
Thanks
popular by topic
- Business (18)
- chasejarvisLIVE (46)
- creativeLIVE.com (10)
- Fine Art (83)
- Gear (112)
- Giving Back (202)
- Guest Post (37)
- How To (141)
- Humor (24)
- Industry (225)
- Inspiration (245)
- iPhone (28)
- People (265)
- Pop Culture (218)
- Production (4)
- Profiles (154)
- Seattle 100 (11)
- SFEAD (10)
- Videos (211)








Chase,
I work with the Hands Off The Internet Coalition and what you may not know…as tech blogger Mark Milliman points out, “Save the Internet is a well meaning web organization intended to create a level playing field for all sites on the Internet. Too bad that its efforts are misguided by spreading fear, uncertainty, and doubt…
Net Neutrality legislation currently proposed will actually set up the same walled garden that it is trying to prevent. The legislation will force all packets for Internet access to be treated equally. That means that AT&T;’s VoIP service receives the same priority as Vonage’s (VG) VoIP service. So far so good, but it also means that those packets are the same as a Bittorrent transfer. Not so good for any provider of time sensitive traffic whether AT&T;, Google, or Vonage.”
hmmm. I understand about some organizations efforts being misguided – it’s a natural occurance, but forgive me: I don’t see what’s wrong with all packets being treated equally? (seriously, no sarcasm here… just trying to get your point)