Chase Jarvis TECH: Strobed Photo Sequences

10/27/2009 06:17:00 AM



Of all the behind the scenes stuff we've showed in recent vids, the one techie thing that far-and-away led to the most questions from readers was the part in this video where I'm photographing X Games uber-skiers Simon Dumont, Colby James West, TJ Shiller, Peter Olenick, and Nick Heine in New Zealand using strobes at 8 frames per second. That's right, all that stuff for the SanDisk campaign you remember reading about earlier. Rail slides and 100 foot airs. 8 frames per second. Strobed.

I know why you had questions.

To be honest, I too didn't think it was possible to shoot any pack at 8 fps for 40 or so frames straight, covering more than 100 feet of distance without frying something or something whimpering out. ...Which is why I tested the concept a number of ways before the shoot. The above video briefly chronicles those tests, the actual shoot, and the cool results.

More images, 2 lighting diagrams, a full gear list, and a couple more tech points after the jump...[click the 'continue reading' link below]

--

Using this idea, we got results like this:



From the diagram below, you'll see that we've got one Broncolor Scoro A4s pack run off a Honda 3k generator. I've moved the heads so they're each front-lighting the rider. My VALs (voice activated light-stands...ie humans! - thx McNally for that term...) are in place and are pointing the Broncolor Unilite heads with Par reflectors at the subject (sorta like shooting a machine gun). The first of the two heads picks up the rider from takeoff to about mid-flight. The second head picks up the riders from about midway thru flight to landing, some 100 feet down the hill.



The other lighting diagram I sketched (below) outlines similar stuff to the one above. We've again got the Broncolor Scoro A4s pack, two heads with VALs, but this time we're running one of my time-tested "sandwich" techniques... a light on each side of the subject. Here, it's Simon.



And that gave me results like this:



Unreal, eh? We actually had to remove about 8 frames during the making of this composite since there was so much overlap...

For you techie's, here's a gear list:

Nikon D3
Nikkor 14-24mm lens
Nikkor 24-70mm lens
Broncolor Scoro A4s pack
Broncolor Unilite heads
Broncolor Par Reflector
SanDisk Extreme Pro card 32GB
Pocket Wizards
Aperture (to process)
Photoshop (to make layered file)
Honda 3.0k generator

Here's a link to B&H if you want to buy stuff.

What to do if this sort of equipment is outta your budget? Try renting stuff. Experiment. Use some of that birthday money from your mom and teach yourself how to use this stuff. And here's a secret: try pickup after 3 on Friday. Rent for Saturday. Most places are closed on Sunday, return gear Monday. 3 days for the price of 1. Don't tell them I told you.

And some tech details:
_Camera set to its maximum sync at 250th of a second (fastest base sync speed for camera)
_Camera set to its highest frame rate - this case 8fps
_Camera on a tripod (for ease in compositing frames later in post production...)
_Broncolor pack output scaled to about 60% or less of full power to keep up with 8fps. Your results must vary. But you should know this is an absolutely incredible statistic. A 3200 watt-second pack at 60% (roughly 2000 w/s) at 8fps for 40 frames or more until my camera buffer was filled.
_Remember from this vid, and the vid I did last friday it's the super short flash duration that's really stopping the action - not the shutter.
_For more on the shutter/flash duration thing, check out the kissing cousin to this vid here, the Chase Jarvis TECH: High Speed Photography vid.
_We're using Photoshop to create the layered file...shooting on a tripod, laying each frame of the jump on top of the other and masking away the unwanted parts of each frame to reveal just the rider on the background...

Lastly, hope this has been informative. I hadn't intended to do a video on this, but there were so many questions about it--plus I truly didn't think this was possible--so I just had to put something together. Lemme know what you think.
--
Get my every move: Follow Chase Jarvis on Twitter
Get exclusive content: Become a Fan on Facebook

Labels: , , , ,



76 Comments:

Blogger Aaron said...

wow you must have taken hundreds of images Chase.... HUNDREDS!!!!

6:29 AM  
Anonymous Photofolio, a study in photography said...

This is just great!!! Thank you for the insights on the equipment!

6:31 AM  
Blogger Eddo said...

Thanks Chase for the clarification of how you create these grand shots! Most of us, including me, will have to make due with far less expensive gear ... but hope to make similar shots one day :p

6:33 AM  
Anonymous Landhes said...

Wow! Such an informative post Chase! Always love ur vids...Sandisk choose the right person for their Campaign :)

6:44 AM  
Anonymous Craig Ferguson (@cfimages) said...

This is cool. Kudos to you for pushing the realms of possibility.

If I didn't live in the tropics, I'd rent some gear and try it. Adding an airticket might be pushing the budget a bit too far though :)

7:03 AM  
Blogger Alexander Jordan said...

nice stuff,

question: in the little question answering vid you said that you pre focused, what about when the boarder is coming towards you, do u just pull focus and hope or can the d3's af actually keep up with that?

thanks

jordan

7:04 AM  
Blogger Ghassan said...

Want to know how do u merge all these photos together ... hope u can do a tutorial on this technique ... coz I tried and looked all over the internet and didn't find one and when I do it using Photoshop CS4 it doesn't do a very good job automatically ... plzzzzzzzzz Chase Jarvis ...

great video chase .. u r the best

best wishes

7:12 AM  
Anonymous André Weigel said...

Very nice "making of"... thank you !

7:17 AM  
Blogger Jonathan Frazier Photography said...

This post has been removed by the author.

7:18 AM  
Blogger Jonathan Frazier said...

Chase, you say it best my friend...

Filthy. Absolutely filthy.

7:20 AM  
Blogger Casey said...

Great post Chase! Can't wait to experiment this winter.

7:22 AM  
Blogger Paul Michael Kane said...

love watching stuff like this!!!

7:28 AM  
Blogger Curtis said...

Hypnotic...

7:38 AM  
Anonymous Quentin Bacon said...

sweet!

7:45 AM  
Blogger Michael said...

You just singlehandedly increased broncolor's stocks.

7:48 AM  
Blogger Christopher Hall said...

all I can say is Wow! Tons of info...thanks for sharing!

7:48 AM  
Blogger Ghislain said...

Wow with my D300 and any consumer lens I have, I would never be able to keep the focus on the subject coming with that me directly to me.... some frame would be out of focus for sure. Great job Chase... WOW

8:01 AM  
Blogger Andrew Hyslop said...

Mindreader. I can scratch this off the list of "things I can't figure out". Thank you Chase.

8:03 AM  
Blogger Zak.Shelhamer said...

It would be sick to do it with a powerpack in a backpack and have the strobe hand held and follow the subject so you dont get those hot spots and the light on him would be consistent, good work though!

8:28 AM  
Blogger Chase Jarvis said...

@zak. Good thinking but it's even easier. The hot spots can easily be corrected for in post production. We left it as such partly outta speed, partly we liked it in an American Apparel sort of way, partly for illustrative reasons.

8:39 AM  
Anonymous szabiakanich said...

That's totally sick. Wow. Never would've thought something like this was even possible. Did you fry any strobes in the process or did everything survive this 'torture'? Also Why didn't you put a third strobe at the botto of the hill as well? I see that the left part of the photo where he's landing he didn't catch too much light. Wouldn't it have been even more amazing to lit him all the way through? Just a thought. :) Great stuff really. I love watching these videos. Can't get enough of them. Thanks again for all your hard work an all of this behind the scenes stuff!

Szabi

9:42 AM  
Anonymous Sebastian said...

hmm, is it "just" the broncolors that can keep up with the 8fps, or was it the honda generator?

thanks for the video answer by the way ;-)

10:13 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Question: "less reliable" could be the description of PW now? They are RADIO so suppose to be faster enough to trigger the broncos ... so, their things are DISTANCE like the adds suggest ... but I need the srobos CLOSE to me ... hehehhehe ... everything to get our money.

10:24 AM  
Anonymous Matt Timmons said...

Dude that is some sick flash recycling- the sound of the strobe in your test back in the studio was furious! Sometimes the gear can be as impressive as the creativity- and the spur of it as well. Cheers!

10:26 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Inspiring Dude! That was just NASTY!!!!! Question, did you pre focus and leave focus on manual or track focus?

And had you thought about doing it as multiple exposures?

10:36 AM  
Blogger John Hildebrand Photography said...

thanks for some great tips its always good to see how other photographers get the job done.

10:38 AM  
Anonymous Flyflinger said...

Chase Jarvis... Making me feel like sh*t about my photography on a regular basis! That was "sic

10:42 AM  
Blogger Frozen Forever Photography said...

Skateboarding guys have been doing this for a long time. Its good to see that you stepped up the scale...

12:05 PM  
Blogger Phat Baby Photographer said...

Most informative post yet on the Sandisk shoot - thx.

12:33 PM  
Blogger Alvaro MAM said...

The video is great, you packed all the info nicely, good job!

By the way, I'm amazed with the sound of the broncolor head.

1:52 PM  
Blogger R. Doyle Bowman said...

I think the sketches are awesome. Previsualization is the key eh?

1:53 PM  
Blogger TJ said...

sick stuff, why 8fps not 9?
also, any more budget oriented system that go shoot that fast?

2:04 PM  
Anonymous Tony Johnson said...

Thanks for your inspiration, insight and willingness to share with us all.

2:23 PM  
Blogger GT animation said...

That is FILTY!! Very nice post work and thanks for sharing.

2:30 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cool.... yet allot of exposure variation per frame. At the start it looks a little hot and by the end a little under done. That said not the easiest shooting conditions. Was it hard to maintain even exposure over the comp?

4:06 PM  
Anonymous Zac said...

It will be interesting to see how many shoots like this will now hit the Flicker pages. For you Strobists, your small flashes can be used to something on a smaller scale...thanks Chase for your willingness to share info, I like the way the armchair photogs always have an opinion on things, when it's not them, out there in the cold, with a client standing behind them and their butts on the line...keep rockin' it brother.

4:23 PM  
Blogger Sodabowski said...

Funnily, I did something a bit similar last summer, but with modest gear: I used the pulse mode of my speedlight to catch a falling waterdrop along its trajectory in a single shot (as can be seen here). I'm glad one of you pros out there gave a try to the concept with top gear, the result is freakin awesome. Thanks for sharing :)

4:31 PM  
Anonymous danno said...

thanks for the info chase,
quick question : how would the new profoto pro-8's compare to the broncolor you used? any experience doing something similar ( not necessarily the cold, but keeping up with power, flash recycle / flash duration & your nikon's fps ) ?

rocksteady,
danno~

8:33 PM  
Blogger Leo said...

That diagram makes me think of a parabolic motion physics problem! High school physics has scarred me for life!

8:59 PM  
Blogger rexyinc said...

ok very impressive chase!...

i love using rapid fire flashies too, they are always lots of fun - i can crank ours out at 11frames sec -

Quick little demo of the FlashPro 500 R - Rapid Fire Strobe. 11 frames sec with Nikons D3 in DX mode.

test vid here - http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=81469635862

quick test - http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=77562360862 and the d3 was set at iso 200, 250shutter and F5.6 in DX mode 11 frames/sec.

( i really need a buffer upgrade on my d3 though :(

we luv you chase!!!

10:06 PM  
Blogger Kevin Winzeler Photography // said...

This post has been removed by the author.

10:10 PM  
Blogger Kevin Winzeler Photography // said...

@Anomymous (Cool.... yet allot of exposure variation per frame...)



It's most likely due to where the person holding the lights is positioned. Prob. positioned a bit higher up on the hill or rail so the first few frames are front lit, front lit, front lit, side lit, side lit, back lit, etc... as they follow the skier with the light. This would be why the exposure varies as well. You'd almost need a moving light set-up similar to the Outside Magazine BTS video lighting (golf cart or a dolly). In this scenario it would be cool to see the guy holding the lights, in motion (on his skis) and following for more consistent exposure. You'd of course, have to make sure the cables were long enough...and good luck matching speed on 80' tables.

Enjoyed Chase! Had a few q's for you on DH's site too -

Utah Photographer | Kevin Winzeler

10:34 PM  
Blogger prasad said...

wow.Great shoot. Thanks for sharing.Special thanks for Bron color.

12:16 AM  
Anonymous Ulrich Schuster said...

Hi Chase,
Ive been enjoying your blog for quite some time now and would like to ask you a few question. How does the picture licensing for your clients work? What should definetly be in the agreement and how do you make sure pictures are not used afterwards? Currently I agreed with the city of munich/Germany to give them a few of my pictures in order to let me in some locations instead of paying a lot of money but I want them to only be able to use those for a specific amount of time what would you suggest ?? I know you are busy but I am sure many of your viewers will find this interesting as well.. Thank you very much

1:29 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is there any reason why you didn't go with a faster camera capable of 10 fps? Also wondering why you didn't rent the new Profoto 8 which could certainly keep up with 10 fps? Many thanks!!

3:39 AM  
Blogger Arthit said...

This post has been removed by the author.

3:40 AM  
Blogger Arthit said...

I want to know why you choose to use Aperture?
but it's very Pro Work i like your work.

3:41 AM  
Blogger Dan said...

Wow. Wow. W O W.

I'm stoked. Gotta try something like that.

Of course, there's always the thought of how to do it one better...

Could the lighting be made more even over multiple shots by backing up the light and getting less variation because of the small relative distance changes as the boarder flies by? It seems like you had enough excess light to back the strobes up a bit.

Also, what about putting the strobes on a toboggan or something really dangerous to pace the boarder. How guttsy are your VAL's?

What a great production you've got there. Fantastic.

Thanks so much for the vid.

5:54 AM  
Anonymous fas said...

Who says its easy to be a camera man.

6:46 AM  
Blogger Bruno Axhausen said...

Sick.

7:11 AM  
Blogger DHunt said...

Keep sharing the knowledge brother! Most of us can only dream of using equipment like this. The equipment deposit alone can put rentals out of reach for the casual user.

8:16 AM  
Anonymous CoCoLiSo said...

The Absolute Dogs Bollocks mate!

9:56 AM  
Blogger Chase Jarvis said...

@dan: I think i may have said it above or on another blog, but the variation in exposure can be largely controlled within each frame with a more careful treatment in post production.

Often times its waaay easier to take an extra hour and some $ on location to get it right in camera as opposed to "just fix it in photoshop" later, but this might be the exception. The environment is quite a dynamic one as it stands, so adding too many moving parts can get complicated quickly... But i LOVE the spirit of your thinking. Right on the money.

10:33 AM  
Blogger Tony Obfenda said...

Chase Jarvis you ARE the man!!...Always an inspiration to take better pictures of the kiddies!!

11:36 AM  
Blogger nikky said...

That's awesome!

Can someone explain to me, like I'm a six-year old, why a (snooted) spotlight wouldn't work in this situation? I mean, it would be so much more convenient than worrying about remote synchs.

1:20 PM  
Blogger mjk_photo said...

you definately make people see what all is possible with your work!
Have you worked with the profoto lights much, and if yes, how do you think they would compare to the lights you used for this sequencing in this situation?
Thanks Chase~

1:36 PM  
Blogger Jared K. said...

Thanks for the tips Chase, love what you are doing. Keep the videos coming!

1:38 PM  
Blogger Chase Jarvis said...

@ mjk_photo
@ anon

regarding the broncolor scoro vs. the profoto 8a. first, both have great feature sets - fast, reliable, etc. but key difference for me and why i pref the bronc: the broncolor is a 3200 w/s pack, whereas the profoto is only a 2400 w/s pack. thus the broncolor has 25% more power.

the broncolor is also cheaper.

3:52 PM  
Blogger Chase Jarvis said...

@ anon 12:24. the PW are generally really reliable. I love love love them. put them in some harsh conditions (weather, light load, interference) and they very occasionally get sticky. i use them professionally on about 99% of our gigs. in this case while shooting the jump, even with fresh batteries we were having some misfires, so we cabled things. and it went well. later that night when we shot the stairs, everything worked peachy keen with the PW's again...so we went with them... mostly bulletproof, sometimes finicky. that's why we always have sync cord handy just in case.

4:20 PM  
Anonymous Ian said...

Thanks so much for taking the time to do this it is very much appreciated. Stunnig images and informative insight, fabulous!

5:26 PM  
Anonymous Will Foster said...

As it was cold... did you have to hardwire your VAL's as well?

5:44 PM  
Blogger mjk_photo said...

Thanks for the feedback man, I'll keep that in mind!

6:23 PM  
Anonymous nicolas chauveau said...

This is cool stuff, thanks for sharing !

1:20 AM  
Anonymous marcus grip said...

I really like that you explain in details and show pictures and videos on how you work and explains why and so on! Really great and this helped me so i think it´s great. I´m gonna rent a similar kit and try it out!

Peace Chase!

2:20 AM  
Anonymous Jerry Avenaim said...

After seeing this site, forget web 2.0, I think my site is web beta http://www.avenaim.com Now if the site could keep up the work. Thanks for inspiring man!

4:11 PM  
Anonymous dave everhart said...

Chase, yer KILLIN' me here! :D

This shoot is, oddly, something I've been mulling about in my brain for the better part of a couple of years. I did something like this years ago, with actors on a black stage; I got the idea from the inner sleeve of Rush's "Moving Pictures" LP, where the members were each caught in stages of show movement. Only, when I did it, I used a regular strobe light, like the kind you used to see at parties, (yep, I just dated myself), and long exposure times.
Went through almost a full block of Tri-X.
I would not have thought to abuse pro strobes like this... thanks for going the extra mile. LOL.
Expect to see some imitations. Myself included. I really wanna try this now, especially living near ski resorts.

9:07 PM  
Blogger Jens said...

Sebastian earlier said in this post about using the generator. Does the generator help increase recycle times at all? ALSO, how does one determine how many watts in a generator one needs for their setup?

1:29 PM  
Blogger Chase Jarvis said...

@ jens. no the generator does not help with recycle times. if anything it could be something that slows it down. which is why we tested it to determine that it did NOT slow down. as far as how big a geni you need for what - somebody a lot smarter that me should be able to tell you. i just know we tested one and it worked.

as as to WHY we used a generator - there was no power out on the slopes and, while broncolor makes some awesome batter powered packs (verso and mobil) there is nothing on the market that is battery powered that could do what we're doing here.

1:59 PM  
Anonymous Mike Yip said...

all I can say is ... SWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET!!!

Now I want to get one of those awesome strobes.

6:19 PM  
Anonymous Travis Johansen said...

Way sweet- the language you use is so funny :)

8fps. very nice.

11:18 AM  
Blogger Nils said...

I did a similar set last year with the hensel up high back country far from the slopes.

http://www.4FR.de/diary/uploads/Blog_B.jpg

Taking a generator up there is probably the next level then...even if the new Hensel is just a fast on 60%

5:24 AM  
Anonymous Moe Maamoun said...

Hi Chase,
Thanks for sharing, that's a superb post. One I've been looking forward for a long time.

I had the same thoughts, but never the chance to actually test it. All my previous attempts didn't give exactly what I wanted.

This is really good stuff!

Thanks a gain.
Moe.

9:21 PM  
Blogger Amy Ralston said...

This was very cool! Thanks for let us in the black box ...I find it very informative to understand the middle process and honestly enjoy the learning process. Great, great work and amazing creativity.

11:33 PM  
Blogger Judy said...

I want one.




Not really sure what I would do with it, but I want one.

1:49 AM  
Blogger richkg said...

Im trying to get a similar setup for a low budget.
I do all my stuff for mainly a hobby right now, so i have limited income.
Just wondering if anyone has any tips or suggestions as to what companies to look at for the strobes?
thanks

1:47 PM  
Anonymous izdelava spletne strani said...

Excellent stuff here

12:29 PM  

Post a Comment


<< Home